Friday, August 03, 2012

Hold the Academics Please





I loved math as a kid.
In grade school, I got awards. I learned natural numbers, ordinals, the reals with both rational and irrational, decimals and fractions, long division and basic Algebra. I also learned most kids are assholes and most classes with even great, caring teachers are boooring; I learned slumping comfortably toward 'F'ailure caused massive trauma in a host of attendant adults that could be easily patched with some quick triage and a few weeks of selective personal sacrifice; I learned to hate school. I understood it intended to help me and recognized it wasn't trying very hard. Regular classes with strict curriculums and standardized testing with time limits and tiny pencils and bubble-filled pages threatening PASS OR FAIL were not, how you say… encouraging? (There was one year of Montessori around the age of eight in Colorado Springs I remember fondly to this day — I got myself out of bed, dressed and remained noncombative during the drive to class.)

Knowing no better, I soldiered on. I took Geometry and Algebra in junior high. I got chickenpox and silver dollar-size blood-filled blisters all over my pubescent 9th-grade body at one point and missed three weeks of study. Upon returning, I found myself to be several theorems behind and unable to catch up; once challenging material became more unmanageable noise in the titanic maelstrom [1 point for using 'maelstrom' in a sentence] of teenhood. But for the grace of a kind teacher, advance I would not.

High school Honors English, Chemistry and Algebra II marked my final attempts at willful compliance. On the up side, apart from a vaguely positive impression of 3rd grade with the glowing Mrs. Schoenberger — my very first gender-specific infatuation — only sophomore Chemistry and Algebra II stand out as interesting subjects presented by desirable teachers… Still, I barely skated through. I was never the best student.

I completed high school by padding my workload, where possible, with anti-academic choices like more art classes, Typing for a second time, Wood Shop, Guitar and Weight Training. (Don't get me started on the horrors of a high school locker room with exposed rows of side-by-side low-boy toilets along one wall, shower heads along another and Coach Ballsqueezer pacing the middle. Disappointed by our particularly weak performance while running laps, he'd lock the entire class inside and scream at us for being soft and likely unable to survive as he did in Vietnam, walking for days and eating rice from his hat).

Free of such institutional dysfunction, I worked for a few years after graduation with zero thought to further schooling. A firm conviction to never again sit my days away, motionless and silent in a fluorescent-lit room, gave me comfort. But, eventually, interpersonal family pressure and my first romantic fiasco made life in a town I really didn't like much anyway increasingly uncomfortable. So, the time came to leave home — one part expulsion, two parts escape.

Averse to school, acceptable routes were few. The specter of countless additional years in class with teachers and students and [aaack] homework made pursuit of my science interests unthinkable. My father, a two-time Army enlistee, convinced me with his oft-repeated phrase "never join the military" that joining the military was a bad idea. Finally, the only option that made any sense also happened to look like the easy way out. Perfect! I pursued the one path that felt comfortable by entering an art program at a two-year trade school several hundred miles away: education à la carte with credentials over easy and some healthy distance on the side. Hold the academics, please.

Imagine my dismay at discovering a portion of tuition and a chunk of my day would be dedicated to basic math in order to satisfy state requirements. Between Typography and Airbrushing, for several hours every week, I sat in a little room at a tiny desk surrounded by other twenty-something professional artist hopefuls studying addition and subtraction, decimals and fractions. Goddamn what a bummer.

___________

This little yarn was inspired by Andrew Hacker's recent opinion piece in The New York Times Sunday Review, Is Algebra Necessary?
http://www.nytimes.com/2012/07/29/opinion/sunday/is-algebra-necessary.html


Thursday, March 22, 2012

EXPLAIN IT SIMPLY



"Any model we make does not describe the universe; it describes what our brains are capable of saying at this time." —Robert Anton Wilson


Sunday, March 11, 2012

recording of simulated artificial female assembly running in real-time on a PS3...



Kara Is Self-AwareA new tech demo featuring sophisticated performance-capture technology made by the game developer Quantic Dream...













+


Jeff Hawkins
(MIT +150 Symposia, 2011)

The Language of the Brain » http://youtu.be/WE6NnlCkrfM


/


Stuart Hameroff
(1 of 2 – Toward a Science of Consciousness, 2010)




Tuesday, February 28, 2012

even the common telephone is evolving


Well,
It Happened
In 1947
(just consider the complexity of what's happened since then)








"It has been said that since the end of World War II, the amount of information generated by our society doubles every seven years. A daily copy of the New York Times, for instance, has as much information as the educated individual of the 16th century absorbed in a whole lifetime. … Even the common telephone—which has been with us for a hundred years now—is evolving into an ideal instrument for the electronic age." —Shatner presents microelectronics to 1976

Equating Angels with Transistors...

http://motherboard.vice.com/2012/2/22/equating-angels-with-transistors-shatner-spent-the-70s-rhapsodizing-about-tech-for-at-t--2



P.S. Thanks Kimberly

a range of hypothetical disgusting situations

Disgust Sensitivity and the Neurophysiology of Left-Right Political Orientations

"Given its primal nature and essential value in avoiding pathogens disgust likely has an effect even without registering in conscious beliefs."

© 2011 Smith et al *


Abstract
Disgust has been described as the most primitive and central of emotions. Thus, it is not surprising that it shapes behaviors in a variety of organisms and in a variety of contexts—including homo sapien politics. People who believe they would be bothered by a range of hypothetical disgusting situations display an increased likelihood of displaying right-of-center rather than left-of-center political orientations. Given its primal nature and essential value in avoiding pathogens disgust likely has an effect even without registering in conscious beliefs. In this article, we demonstrate that individuals with marked involuntary physiological responses to disgusting images, such as of a man eating a large mouthful of writhing worms, are more likely to self-identify as conservative and, especially, to oppose gay marriage than are individuals with more muted physiological responses to the same images. This relationship holds even when controlling for the degree to which respondents believe themselves to be disgust sensitive and suggests that people's physiological predispositions help to shape their political orientations.

Full article...

* This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.



+


Can Politics Make You Vomit? Of course.

"On Sunday, Rick Santorum told ABC’s George Stephanopoulos that the idea of absolute separation of church and state “makes me want to throw up.” In October, the GOP candidate said he “almost threw up” reading John F. Kennedy’s 1960 speech on the topic. Can just thinking about something you find morally objectionable cause you to lose your lunch?"

Full article...


+


When Evidence Is Powerless
by Salman Hameed

"It seems that for many there is no connection between belief and evidence. If evidence is powerless, what are some other factors that shape their beliefs, and what are the implications for science education?"

Video from TEDxPioneerValley (19 minutes)...






Monday, February 27, 2012

mind under matter


Consciousness in the Universe: Neuroscience, Quantum Space-Time Geometry and Orch OR Theory

FEB 05 2012

"Instead [of OR], our criterion for consciousness is Orch OR, conditions for which are fairly stringent: superposition must be isolated from the decoherence effects of the random environment for long enough to reach the DP threshold. Small superpositions are easier to isolate, but require longer reduction times τ. Large superpositions will reach threshold quickly, but are intrinsically more difficult to isolate. Nonetheless, we believe that there is evidence that such superpositions could occur within sufficiently large collections of microtubules in the brain for τ to be some fraction of a second. 

It is our belief that, quite apart from detailed aspects of the physical mechanisms that are involved in the production of consciousness in human brains, quantum mechanics is an incomplete theory. Some completion is needed, and the DP proposal for an OR scheme underlying quantum theory's R-process would be a definite possibility. If such a scheme as this is indeed respected by Nature, then there is a fundamental additional ingredient to our presently understood laws of Nature which plays an important role at the Planck-scale level of space-time structure. The Orch OR proposal takes advantage of this, suggesting that conscious experience itself plays such a role in the operation of the laws of the universe."

Consciousness in the Universe » http://www.quantum-mind.org/Cosmology160.html



The brain’s molecular memory code revealed?

JAN 30 2012

"Generally considered as merely bone-like structural girders, microtubule lattices have also been proposed to process information via dynamic interactive states of tubulins. But any semblance of a common code connecting synaptic activity to microtubule processes has been missing. Until now."




Stuart Hameroff - Beyond Belief 2006 

Video 1 of 2 » http://youtu.be/RFvaRTJ76A8